13 Responses for "Which Bible translation is best for you? Which one is the most accurate and easy to understand?"

1. Jeancommunicates February 8th, 2009 at 8:07 am 1

   Koning James Version

2. Sarah F February 11th, 2009 at 9:19 am 2

   The quote about loveee.

3. rt66lt February 13th, 2009 at 6:31 pm 3

   Ich gehe zurück zum Griechen (neues Testament irgendwie) – ich bevorzugen die neue korrigierter Standard-Version für Englisch.

4. Azriel Nihilus February 14th, 2009 at 10:10 pm 4

   The best one by far is the original in Greek.
   It’s definitely the most accurate, and in its original state it’s easier to appreciate the artistry of the literature.
   I can’t say I understand everything since I’m not fluent in Greek, but it’s still my favourite.

5. Eliaas2 February 15th, 2009 at 6:48 pm 5

   King James, moet iets meer recht als ze houden het heruitgeven

6. David H February 16th, 2009 at 5:24 pm 6

   Wol? angielski Wersja standardowa. Jest to dok?adne i ?atwe do zrozumienia.

7. Mrs. C February 19th, 2009 at 7:58 pm 7

   Me gusta el que más te guste.

8. macie February 22nd, 2009 at 7:39 am 8

   El mejor para mí es la New King James Estudio de la Biblia. Habrá muchas respuestas diferentes a esa pregunta, pero la NKJSB es muy good.I leer una versión diferente a través de cada año.

9. 2adise February 23rd, 2009 at 5:42 am 9

   New World Translation used by Jehovah’s Witnesses. To see more info do a search on Wikipedia.

10. Mr Ed February 25th, 2009 at 9:19 pm 10

    While I mostly use French and Spanish Bibles, in English I tend to use the New American Standard Bible, and the New King James Bible (because I have a fairly large print one!)
    The King James Bible is a masterpiece of English literature; and excellent translation. However it is NOT a divinely inspired translation. It is based on manuscripts that Erasmus put together. However Erasmus was lacking some of the Greek manuscripts, and to make up for it, he actually trasnlated part of Revelation from the Latin Vulgate to Greek!!!
    On the other hand, the KJV was put together by a team of scholars, they did an excellent job. But the English language, like every other living language, changes in meaning over the centuries. The advantage of a more modern translation is twofold:
    1) The English words say what they actually mean today
    2) We have much more accurate, and more numerous Greek manuscripts for the New Testament.
    Some protest that certain modern translations have “liberal” scholars on their team. However each one of those also has very conservative scholars, and they check on eachother, making sure that the translation is not influenced by personal theology.
    Remember that the KJV was ordered (not translated) by King James, who himself was a pervert, at a time when there was a Catholic trasnlation, and a Protestant translation (the Geneva Bible). He ordered the Authorized Version (reall name of the KJV) in order to try to unify theological thought in the United Kingdom. He wanted to fight the puritans on one hand, and the Catholics on the other. His intention was more political than spiritual. That did not prevent the xholars from doing a fantastic job. It’s just that we mustn’t deify their work, and think that we mus remain forever with that translation.
    Edit:
    In the case of just about every translation done in modern times, there is a large team of experts working on it with an even larger team of consultants, from a variety of theological position (denominations, etc.), who make sure there are no tendentious translations. The only exception to this that I know of is the New World translation by the Jehovah’s Witnesses, which was done with the specific purpose of justifying the existence of that particular group. I have, in the past, compared it to the Greek and found a number of mistranslations in it.
    In the other translations, they are all accurately translated; the differences do not lie in alleged mistakes by others, simply in the emphasis given to certain meanings. (It is virtually impossible to literally translate anything from any language). That is why I recommend using a variety of translations if you want to do serious Bible study.
    The best translation? – the one you read!!!

11. Kev February 25th, 2009 at 9:43 pm 11

    Me gusta la Traducción del Nuevo Mundo. No se ha eliminado el nombre del autor. El Rey Jaime dejó en unos pocos lugares como Salmos 83:18, pero en los escritos originales en griego de las escrituras solo fue impreso casi 7.000 veces! Esto me hace pensar (Hechos 2:21) 21 Y todo aquel que invocare el nombre de Jehová será salvo "." ¿Cómo se llaman su nombre si no lo saben y se pierde en un Dios trinitario?

12. I love God February 26th, 2009 at 10:17 am 12

    Najbardziej dok?adne i który nigdy nie by? i nigdy nie zostanie zmieniona ?wi?ty Koran .. Biblia zosta?a zmieniona tak wiele razy, ?e jego ?art, nawet po to, aby nie obrazi?. wouldnt i chc? i?? czyj?? moralno?ci napisane przez ludzi. Koran w 100% i jest .. s?owa Bo?e!

13. BibleChooser March 1st, 2009 at 12:32 am 13

    Goed, kunt u niet het realiseren, maar u stelt hier 3 vrij verschillende vragen.

    1) welke bijbel voor u best is (wat goed-verwoord is, als verschillende bijbels geschikte verschillende mensen)

    2) welke bijbel het nauwkeurigst is

    3) welke bijbel het gemakkelijkst is te begrijpen (wat betekent gewoonlijk dat het niet overal dichtbij aan het zijn het nauwkeurigst is)

    Ik adviseer sterk dat u deze pagina herziet

    Als u de volgende vragen kunt beantwoorden, kan ik een zeer nauwkeurige lijst van aanbevelingen voor u verstrekken. Merk op dat de plaats hieronder niet volledig – functioneel nog is, wat is waarom ik van elke pagina afzonderlijk een lijst maak. Schrijf eenvoudig elke keus neer u op elke pagina maakt en me de resultaten met de elektronische post verstuurt en ik kan een nauwkeurige aanbeveling verstrekken.

    1)
    2)
    3)
    4) hebt u een Rooms-katholieke bijbel nodig?

    Jim