Comments on: Which Bible translation is best for you? Which one is the most accurate and easy to understand? http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/ Professional Translation and Free Translator For All Your Translation Needs Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:17:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: BibleChooser http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-716 BibleChooser Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:32:46 +0000 http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/#comment-716 Goed, kunt u niet het realiseren, maar u stelt hier 3 vrij verschillende vragen. 1) welke bijbel voor u best is (wat goed-verwoord is, als verschillende bijbels geschikte verschillende mensen) 2) welke bijbel het nauwkeurigst is 3) welke bijbel het gemakkelijkst is te begrijpen (wat betekent gewoonlijk dat het niet overal dichtbij aan het zijn het nauwkeurigst is) Ik adviseer sterk dat u deze pagina herziet Als u de volgende vragen kunt beantwoorden, kan ik een zeer nauwkeurige lijst van aanbevelingen voor u verstrekken. Merk op dat de plaats hieronder niet volledig - functioneel nog is, wat is waarom ik van elke pagina afzonderlijk een lijst maak. Schrijf eenvoudig elke keus neer u op elke pagina maakt en me de resultaten met de elektronische post verstuurt en ik kan een nauwkeurige aanbeveling verstrekken. 1) 2) 3) 4) hebt u een Rooms-katholieke bijbel nodig? Jim Goed, kunt u niet het realiseren, maar u stelt hier 3 vrij verschillende vragen.

1) welke bijbel voor u best is (wat goed-verwoord is, als verschillende bijbels geschikte verschillende mensen)

2) welke bijbel het nauwkeurigst is

3) welke bijbel het gemakkelijkst is te begrijpen (wat betekent gewoonlijk dat het niet overal dichtbij aan het zijn het nauwkeurigst is)

Ik adviseer sterk dat u deze pagina herziet

Als u de volgende vragen kunt beantwoorden, kan ik een zeer nauwkeurige lijst van aanbevelingen voor u verstrekken. Merk op dat de plaats hieronder niet volledig – functioneel nog is, wat is waarom ik van elke pagina afzonderlijk een lijst maak. Schrijf eenvoudig elke keus neer u op elke pagina maakt en me de resultaten met de elektronische post verstuurt en ik kan een nauwkeurige aanbeveling verstrekken.

1)
2)
3)
4) hebt u een Rooms-katholieke bijbel nodig?

Jim

]]> By: I love God http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-715 I love God Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:17:58 +0000 http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/#comment-715 Najbardziej dok?adne i który nigdy nie by? i nigdy nie zostanie zmieniona ?wi?ty Koran .. Biblia zosta?a zmieniona tak wiele razy, ?e jego ?art, nawet po to, aby nie obrazi?. wouldnt i chc? i?? czyj?? moralno?ci napisane przez ludzi. Koran w 100% i jest .. s?owa Bo?e! Najbardziej dok?adne i który nigdy nie by? i nigdy nie zostanie zmieniona ?wi?ty Koran .. Biblia zosta?a zmieniona tak wiele razy, ?e jego ?art, nawet po to, aby nie obrazi?. wouldnt i chc? i?? czyj?? moralno?ci napisane przez ludzi. Koran w 100% i jest .. s?owa Bo?e!

]]> By: Kev http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-714 Kev Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:43:34 +0000 http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/#comment-714 Me gusta la Traducción del Nuevo Mundo. No se ha eliminado el nombre del autor. El Rey Jaime dejó en unos pocos lugares como Salmos 83:18, pero en los escritos originales en griego de las escrituras solo fue impreso casi 7.000 veces! Esto me hace pensar (Hechos 2:21) 21 Y todo aquel que invocare el nombre de Jehová será salvo "." ¿Cómo se llaman su nombre si no lo saben y se pierde en un Dios trinitario? Me gusta la Traducción del Nuevo Mundo. No se ha eliminado el nombre del autor. El Rey Jaime dejó en unos pocos lugares como Salmos 83:18, pero en los escritos originales en griego de las escrituras solo fue impreso casi 7.000 veces! Esto me hace pensar (Hechos 2:21) 21 Y todo aquel que invocare el nombre de Jehová será salvo "." ¿Cómo se llaman su nombre si no lo saben y se pierde en un Dios trinitario?

]]> By: Mr Ed http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-713 Mr Ed Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:19:15 +0000 http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/#comment-713 While I mostly use French and Spanish Bibles, in English I tend to use the New American Standard Bible, and the New King James Bible (because I have a fairly large print one!) The King James Bible is a masterpiece of English literature; and excellent translation. However it is NOT a divinely inspired translation. It is based on manuscripts that Erasmus put together. However Erasmus was lacking some of the Greek manuscripts, and to make up for it, he actually trasnlated part of Revelation from the Latin Vulgate to Greek!!! On the other hand, the KJV was put together by a team of scholars, they did an excellent job. But the English language, like every other living language, changes in meaning over the centuries. The advantage of a more modern translation is twofold: 1) The English words say what they actually mean today 2) We have much more accurate, and more numerous Greek manuscripts for the New Testament. Some protest that certain modern translations have "liberal" scholars on their team. However each one of those also has very conservative scholars, and they check on eachother, making sure that the translation is not influenced by personal theology. Remember that the KJV was ordered (not translated) by King James, who himself was a pervert, at a time when there was a Catholic trasnlation, and a Protestant translation (the Geneva Bible). He ordered the Authorized Version (reall name of the KJV) in order to try to unify theological thought in the United Kingdom. He wanted to fight the puritans on one hand, and the Catholics on the other. His intention was more political than spiritual. That did not prevent the xholars from doing a fantastic job. It's just that we mustn't deify their work, and think that we mus remain forever with that translation. Edit: In the case of just about every translation done in modern times, there is a large team of experts working on it with an even larger team of consultants, from a variety of theological position (denominations, etc.), who make sure there are no tendentious translations. The only exception to this that I know of is the New World translation by the Jehovah's Witnesses, which was done with the specific purpose of justifying the existence of that particular group. I have, in the past, compared it to the Greek and found a number of mistranslations in it. In the other translations, they are all accurately translated; the differences do not lie in alleged mistakes by others, simply in the emphasis given to certain meanings. (It is virtually impossible to literally translate anything from any language). That is why I recommend using a variety of translations if you want to do serious Bible study. The best translation? - the one you read!!! While I mostly use French and Spanish Bibles, in English I tend to use the New American Standard Bible, and the New King James Bible (because I have a fairly large print one!)
The King James Bible is a masterpiece of English literature; and excellent translation. However it is NOT a divinely inspired translation. It is based on manuscripts that Erasmus put together. However Erasmus was lacking some of the Greek manuscripts, and to make up for it, he actually trasnlated part of Revelation from the Latin Vulgate to Greek!!!
On the other hand, the KJV was put together by a team of scholars, they did an excellent job. But the English language, like every other living language, changes in meaning over the centuries. The advantage of a more modern translation is twofold:
1) The English words say what they actually mean today
2) We have much more accurate, and more numerous Greek manuscripts for the New Testament.
Some protest that certain modern translations have “liberal” scholars on their team. However each one of those also has very conservative scholars, and they check on eachother, making sure that the translation is not influenced by personal theology.
Remember that the KJV was ordered (not translated) by King James, who himself was a pervert, at a time when there was a Catholic trasnlation, and a Protestant translation (the Geneva Bible). He ordered the Authorized Version (reall name of the KJV) in order to try to unify theological thought in the United Kingdom. He wanted to fight the puritans on one hand, and the Catholics on the other. His intention was more political than spiritual. That did not prevent the xholars from doing a fantastic job. It’s just that we mustn’t deify their work, and think that we mus remain forever with that translation.
Edit:
In the case of just about every translation done in modern times, there is a large team of experts working on it with an even larger team of consultants, from a variety of theological position (denominations, etc.), who make sure there are no tendentious translations. The only exception to this that I know of is the New World translation by the Jehovah’s Witnesses, which was done with the specific purpose of justifying the existence of that particular group. I have, in the past, compared it to the Greek and found a number of mistranslations in it.
In the other translations, they are all accurately translated; the differences do not lie in alleged mistakes by others, simply in the emphasis given to certain meanings. (It is virtually impossible to literally translate anything from any language). That is why I recommend using a variety of translations if you want to do serious Bible study.
The best translation? – the one you read!!!

]]> By: 2adise http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-712 2adise Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:42:33 +0000 http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/#comment-712 New World Translation used by Jehovah's Witnesses. To see more info do a search on Wikipedia. New World Translation used by Jehovah’s Witnesses. To see more info do a search on Wikipedia.

]]> By: macie http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-711 macie Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:39:56 +0000 http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/#comment-711 El mejor para mí es la New King James Estudio de la Biblia. Habrá muchas respuestas diferentes a esa pregunta, pero la NKJSB es muy good.I leer una versión diferente a través de cada año. El mejor para mí es la New King James Estudio de la Biblia. Habrá muchas respuestas diferentes a esa pregunta, pero la NKJSB es muy good.I leer una versión diferente a través de cada año.

]]> By: Mrs. C http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-710 Mrs. C Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:58:05 +0000 http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/#comment-710 Me gusta el que más te guste. Me gusta el que más te guste.

]]> By: David H http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-709 David H Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:24:53 +0000 http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/#comment-709 Wol? angielski Wersja standardowa. Jest to dok?adne i ?atwe do zrozumienia. Wol? angielski Wersja standardowa. Jest to dok?adne i ?atwe do zrozumienia.

]]> By: Eliaas2 http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-708 Eliaas2 Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:48:39 +0000 http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/#comment-708 King James, moet iets meer recht als ze houden het heruitgeven King James, moet iets meer recht als ze houden het heruitgeven

]]> By: Azriel Nihilus http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/comment-page-1/#comment-707 Azriel Nihilus Sat, 14 Feb 2009 22:10:20 +0000 http://translationonlineguide.com/which-bible-translation-is-best-for-you-which-one-is-the-most-accurate-and-easy-to-understand/#comment-707 The best one by far is the original in Greek. It's definitely the most accurate, and in its original state it's easier to appreciate the artistry of the literature. I can't say I understand everything since I'm not fluent in Greek, but it's still my favourite. The best one by far is the original in Greek.
It’s definitely the most accurate, and in its original state it’s easier to appreciate the artistry of the literature.
I can’t say I understand everything since I’m not fluent in Greek, but it’s still my favourite.

]]>